Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roland Garros Update

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by glacierguy View Post
    George Best career trophies: 1 European Cup, 2 Division One Championships
    George was something else, wasn't he? One of the most amazing soccer players ever. He moved like very much like Nastase too.
    Stotty

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by stotty View Post

      George was something else, wasn't he? One of the most amazing soccer players ever. He moved like very much like Nastase too.
      If you didn't see it with your own eyes (on TV) you wouldn't believe how good he was. My point being that it's how bright the light shines, not how long you can keep it on. So Fed for me. (And I'm only considering the modern era.)

      Comment


      • #93
        Every major has to have a "Cinderella, or Cinderella". For me, it was 19 yo Zheng Qinwen -- the only player to get a set ( or a lead) off women's winner Iga Swiatek, losing 7-6(5) 0-6 2-6.

        Zheng hit with some of the highest velocity of any woman player in the event. I posted those numbers earlier in this thread.

        Here's some background on what a young player from a low GDP country has to do to become a professional player. Note the particular coaches she's had.


        NYT excerpts:
        /
        "Zheng, now based in Barcelona, Spain, and coached by Pere Riba, a former top-100 men’s player, has spent much of her short life away from home. Originally from the central Chinese city of Shiyan, Zheng was encouraged by her parents to choose a sport.

        She was an only child but said she moved to Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province and about 250 miles from Shiyan, when she was just 8. She said she spent four years there. ...

        The talent scouts soon agreed. IMG signed her to a contract at age 11, not long after her father convinced her mother to make the long journey to the United States with Zheng in November 2013 to take part in the Nick Bollettieri Discovery Open, an event at the IMG Academy in Bradenton, Fla., that was open to young players without an invitation.

        Her first impression?
        .
        “The first thought I had in the head was, ‘Wow, the sky is so blue,’” she said. “Because China, you know, had a little bit of pollution at that time.”

        Upon returning to China, she eventually relocated to Beijing to train at an academy run by Carlos Rodriguez, the Argentine-Belgian coach who worked with Li at the end of her career and had spent more than a decade coaching Justine Henin, a former No. 1 player.
        Zheng said she spent 90 minutes a day working with Rodriguez for several years on technique, tactics and her mentality. “I think Carlos made the base for what I am right now,” Zheng said.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by stroke View Post
          I would be very interested in Nadal's and Ruud's forehand average spin rates. Never saw any numbers the entire match. It certainly is clear to me no one bends/swerves the forehand like Nadal, but in the past, Ruud's forehand spin rates compare favorably to Nadal. I think the rpm spin rate is the the more telling forehand stat. They all hit plenty of mph's.
          Sorry. I can't find spin "averages" on the Roland Garros site, but the InfoSys data has numbers for individual "winners" if one is willing to spend the tedious time digging through each shot .

          But I also resurrected up the research I did last year for TPN (table below), literally going through hundreds of individual shots to find the high "outliers".

          After that table are two captures of InfoSys data on a Ruud shots, one from this year at Roland Garros showing 3,509 RPMs, the other from last year vs Bublik at Paris, I believe showing 3,716 RPMs.

          A couple years before, a compilation showed Ruud having the highest spin average, higher than Rafa, but lower MPHs.

          Hope that helps.

          filedata/fetch?id=97615&d=1654543814&type=thumb

          filedata/fetch?id=97616&d=1641232170&type=thumb

          filedata/fetch?id=97617&d=1654544107&type=thumb
          You do not have permission to view this gallery.
          This gallery has 3 photos.
          Last edited by jimlosaltos; 06-06-2022, 11:44 AM.

          Comment


          • #95
            I have also gathered that some players like Berrettini, Tsitsipas, and Ruud, seem to be putting up more rpm's than Rafa, but as JY had alluded to, no one can measure the exact type of spin. It seems to me the Rafa hook spin is stand alone, the way he can use it to expand the court on the ad side, and bring it back into the court on the deuce side. The closest thing tennis wise I have ever seen to ping pong type spin. If you ever watch or Google any world class ping pong, they are all using the hook type topspin.
            Last edited by stroke; 06-06-2022, 04:01 PM.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by stroke View Post
              I have also gathered that some players like Berrettini, Tsitsipas, and Ruud, seem to be putting up more rpm's than Rafa, but as JY had alluded to, no one can measure the exact type of spin. It seems to me the Rafa hook spin is stand alone, the way he can use it to expand the court on the ad side, and bring it back into the court on the deuce side. The closest thing tennis wise I have ever seen to ping pong type spin. If you ever watch or Google any world class ping pong, they are all using the hook type topspin.
              I wish someone would look at sidespin in tennis. There is no technical reason it can't be measured -- just takes resources (aka money)

              Hey, it's only money !

              If the spin of an electron can be measured, surely a tennis ball's can <g>.

              { Bigger $ involved in the electron, since its quantum states, including spin, are keys to quantum computing, using "Spooky Action At a Distance", or teleportation ala Star Trek}
              https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/25/t...smid=url-share }

              More down to earth, baseball pitchers work on the type of spin they use.

              Odd note: One of the first times I thought about sidespin on Rafa's forehand was when billionaire Larry Ellison talked about hitting with Rafa before the Indian Wells tournament Ellison runs and noting how the sidespin on his forehand made hitting difficult.

              Here's an example of how MLB uses spin:
              • She astonishes me’: How an astrophysicist is helping the Oakland A’s fine-tune their pitches
                Oakland Athletics pitching analyst Samantha Schultz brings astrophysics to her MLB job


                https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/08/...their-pitches/


                Excerpts: "Her post-graduate plan had been to get her Ph.D. in particle physics. That wasn’t her plan anymore. Through tears over the phone, Schultz told her mother the new one: to work in baseball."


                "Schultz understands a breaking ball can be more effective when its gyro spin — or bullet spin — is high. Or a two-seam fastball can be more effective when it creates turbulent pockets of air. She’ll suggest a pitcher adjust his grip or throw harder at a different angle to create the wanted movement.

                “If I say, ‘OK, we need to get more gyro spin on this ball,’ what I might say to a pitcher is to roll it off your middle finger,” Schultz said.

                She knows Trivino’s cutter needs to have force that creates movement to the negative side. That means Trivino must apply different pressures or throw at different angles to get his cutter to actually cut off his other pitches.


                With Schultz’s help, Trivino is finally seeing negative movement on his cutter again. He knows in Schultz’s terms, those negatives are a positive.


                “That’s the beautiful thing about Sam,” Trivino said. “I’m getting negative numbers now.”
              Last edited by jimlosaltos; 06-07-2022, 10:37 AM.

              Comment


              • #97
                On the off chance this digression is of interest:

                Perhaps someone has tried this in tennis, but as long as I've followed tennis I've never heard of that.

                Rapsodo is a $3,000 high-speed camera-based device that can measure ball spin, including the direction not just RPMs. It started in golf, where it can track the movement of dimples on a golf ball, then reached into baseball, where it tracks the seam. Presumably it could track a tennis ball logo - if the software development work was worth the money.
                https://rapsodo.com/shop/product/rap...xoCgKsQAvD_BwE

                Rapsodo measures components of spin on a baseball pitch, and describes how the pitch will or will not break in turns of percent of spin that is gyro spin
                https://rapsodo.com/understanding-ra...ider-changeup/

                Overview:


                One vid here:
                https://youtu.be/tkd5DcapAHc

                filedata/fetch?id=97626&d=1654626127&type=thumb
                filedata/fetch?id=97627&d=1654626773&type=thumb
                filedata/fetch?id=97628&d=1654626773&type=thumb

                #
                You do not have permission to view this gallery.
                This gallery has 3 photos.
                Last edited by jimlosaltos; 06-07-2022, 11:35 AM.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by stroke View Post
                  I have also gathered that some players like Berrettini, Tsitsipas, and Ruud, seem to be putting up more rpm's than Rafa, but as JY had alluded to, no one can measure the exact type of spin. It seems to me the Rafa hook spin is stand alone, the way he can use it to expand the court on the ad side, and bring it back into the court on the deuce side. The closest thing tennis wise I have ever seen to ping pong type spin. If you ever watch or Google any world class ping pong, they are all using the hook type topspin.
                  It is a devastating shot because he keeps righties pinned into the backhand corner (or runs them off the court) with it. Then he belts one up the line when he has the gap or just to keep opponents honest. Novak has a hooking forehand also and, if you remember, he first used it to good effect in the earlier days when he had finally learned to master Rafa by pulling him off the court and forcing him to chip his backhand. But Novak hits more 'over' the ball whereas Rafa hits 'round' it and gives the ball real bend.

                  I can't imagine 14 FO's ever being beaten and I wonder if it's the greatest achievement in sport, not just tennis. And he's done it in an era of great players that include Novak and Roger.
                  Stotty

                  Comment

                  Who's Online

                  Collapse

                  There are currently 8255 users online. 4 members and 8251 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 139,261 at 09:55 PM on 08-18-2024.

                  Working...
                  X