Originally posted by licensedcoach
View Post
Everything you say flies in the face of conventional coaching wisdom - sorry.
"You just have to believe imagery was absolutely key back in the days when there were no high speed camcorders or and our knowledge of biomechanics was far more limited. Gonzales spent his formative years watching other players and trying to copy the better parts of others' strokes. It's likely all the great players of the past learned their tennis way."
Its called a fast eye. Every good athlete and coach has it, 100 percent. Can't say I need slow motion. I see it. I know other coaches who have coached good athletes who read scenarios quickly. Its an ability - to you the game is fast, but, to those who have put in the work its painfully slow. Biomechanics was not limited at all in the 1970's, and the Russian's, German's system were incredible. Only now, are we understanding the level of its brilliance. I learned Russian, and located all the writngs of the great Valeriy Lobanovskyi, and he was far ahead in biomechanics of soccer than you can imagine, as was Ben Johnson's sprint coach Charlie Francis. We sure tend to over-rate ourselves as a coaches, and refuse to respect the lessons of the past. Harry Hopman, Mike Agassi, Larisa Preobrazhenskaya - miles ahead of 99 percent of coaches today. They did not need slow motion to see it ... like every great coach and player they had the vision to slow it down.
"A coach who works nearby has all his kids practicing their turn without a ball and freezing at the left arm stretch. He says he likes to embed this image. It works. All his students have a wonderful turn and a taught left arm stretch."
Every kid is wonderful? Really? Ain't many wonderful tennis players I have seen coming from Britan. I think you are living in fantasy land.
It's wonderful to come across as if one knows what one is talking about as a coach, but it often wreaks havoc once students try to process that information on a court. Often the best thing we can do as coaches is get over our vanity and dumb down.
Dumb down? Kind of disrespectful to your athletes, don't you think? Maybe they are clever, and just don't listen to you?
Use minimal words and far more imagery.
That won't work well with verbal athletes. Great athletes and coaches generally like to talk about there passion, and work things out. If you ever have a great athlete or work with a world class coach - you will understand what I mean. Most love to communicate and there enthusiasm is infectious, and you never hear them saying its time to dumb down the athlete.
My son has a world-class backhand volley. He learned it naturally by watching Henman and Edberg. I never coached him on that shot once.
I have yet to see a kid who is world class in anything at a young age. Never, ever, never. Give me a call when a kid is 15 or 16. I've been burned way to many times. I'd love to see what you think is world class ... but, really you are mistaking projection and potential for something that is not a reality (just yet). Get a grip. Please.
Sometimes the best coaching a coach can do is to shut up, and the best shots are always natural anyway.
Sounds like you are a burned out, and frustrated coach. Check out the video of Federer at 19 - not much there looks natural to me except the serve. Thats a great motion, and it hasn't changed. His backhand, and forehand weren't nice, but, with a ton of work on his hips, movement and nuerlogy he became a totally different player overnight around 19 to 21. Roger never swung the racket like a dream EVER in his life - he worked like hell to develop what may be the best technique ever in the game from the waist (up), and movement certainly never came naturally to the guy as he certainly doesn't have that type of natural propensity for proper gait or world class speed in any direction.
Check out Roger at 16, he looks nothing even close to the player he'd become much later when he figured out optimal technique.
Leave a comment: