Hi John, how's it going?
Strangely enough, I hit with a 4 / 3.5 grip and typically prefer using a neutral stance.
Click here if you wish to see a clip of it.
As you may see, my unit turn is moderate which is why I think the neutral stance doesn't feel "akward" to me. However, I've recently been working on lengthing my swing (it's quite compact as you can see), and part of this is a bigger unit turn. But when I make the bigger turn, I can clearly feel the "akwardness" you refer to with the neutral stance.
I think the moderate unit turn allows my hips to stay more open when I step in, therefore keeping them more out of the way of my upper body rotation. However, when I take a larger unit turn, my hips close more, and my step in gets closer to a closed stance.
So, do you think it's reasonable for people with more extreme grips to use a more moderate unit turn to be better able to step into the ball? Or does my clip show the "akwardness" you refer to even though I don't feel it?
Vin
Strangely enough, I hit with a 4 / 3.5 grip and typically prefer using a neutral stance.
Click here if you wish to see a clip of it.
As you may see, my unit turn is moderate which is why I think the neutral stance doesn't feel "akward" to me. However, I've recently been working on lengthing my swing (it's quite compact as you can see), and part of this is a bigger unit turn. But when I make the bigger turn, I can clearly feel the "akwardness" you refer to with the neutral stance.
I think the moderate unit turn allows my hips to stay more open when I step in, therefore keeping them more out of the way of my upper body rotation. However, when I take a larger unit turn, my hips close more, and my step in gets closer to a closed stance.
So, do you think it's reasonable for people with more extreme grips to use a more moderate unit turn to be better able to step into the ball? Or does my clip show the "akwardness" you refer to even though I don't feel it?
Vin
Comment