Originally posted by don_budge
View Post
Originally posted by klacr
View Post
Originally posted by gzhpcu
View Post
Some thoughts on the final...
I have mixed feeling about the final and modern tennis. After three sets I went to bed. I found the final a drag. Three sets of baseline slugging was about all I could stand. It's not that I cannot admire to some degree what's going on out there, but it's so damn repetitive. Once you've seen about 20 of Stan's 100mph backhands down the line, you've pretty much seen them all.
Djokovic became impotent it seemed and could do nothing to dent Stan's slugging. Stan was covering, and quite easily, everything Djokovic could throw at him, and Djokovic has nothing else to throw in the mix. He can't negate Stan's chipped returns by serve and volleying, he can's mix things up with slice or angles.
Everything got on my nerves by set three. Stan pointing to his forehand every time he won a big point, Djokovic ranting and breaking his racket. It all got too much.
Willander thinks the future of the game is coming to the net. That's doubtful...never going to happen. Would you fancy coming to the net on one of Stan's backhands? And anyway the art (which can only be handed down) has been lost. You cannot learn things in a void once a generation has failed to hand something down...or should I have said the newer generation failed to pick something up?
I think Djokovic was healthy and fine and can offer no excuses. Stan is actually the only player that has Novak's number in that type of big-game-long-match scenario. I found the match psychologically interesting at least.
I think Djokovic may have gone past his best. Still number one in the world perhaps, but a fraction past his best. I doubt he will catch Roger's 17 slams. He will fall just short of that.
Connors was beside himself all last week. Players quitting with minor injuries, players seemingly half trying or even giving up. It drove Connors mad apparently...scathing he was. Quite right.
I think there could well be an element with some in the top 20 that life is fine at that ranking. Why strive for more when you are earning fortunes as the world number 19 or 20? I could be wrong but why would so many players call the trainer and quit so easily otherwise? As Connors said..."It's the US Open for God's sake."
I enjoyed three of the matches immensely. Pouille v Nadal was my favourite....and a few others were decent.
So, yes, mixed feelings. I can admire some elements of the game but so many other elements are missing, namely variety...and guile.
Stotty
Comment