Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some observations on Nadal's Running Forehand

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some observations on Nadal's Running Forehand

    Watching/trying to understand this clip of Nadal is keeping me up:

    Ok, so check out the frame 5 frames before contact. That is the bottom of Nadal's backswing/the start of his forward swing. The tip of the frame looks to be about a foot off the ground and about two feet behind the left foot. The racquet face is about 45 degrees to the court surface and the hitting elbow is either bent or straight (can't tell in this frame).

    Moving into contact, watch how little shoulder rotation there is. The shoulders don't seem to be "turning into the shot" at all. Instead, the hitting arm is driving up and forward as a unit.

    One frame before contact: check out the angle between the non-hitting racquet surface and Nadal's forehand--it looks to be 90 degrees if you're looking at his arm. But we cannot see the angle clearly by looking at Rafa's arm. Can we actually CLEARLY determine this angle? Hmm. Check out that shadow next to the bottom right hand corner of the viewing window (where it says Tennisplayer.net). What you see is that the angle is greater than 90 degrees--at the very least, I think it's a 100 degrees.

    Contact: I guess actually a little after contact--the fact that you can't see the actual contact, even with a high speed camera, is indicative of Nadal's racquet speed. More on that later. The aforementioned angle is about a 100 degrees still and doesn't seem to have changed. Comparing this frame to the previous frame, one cannot say that there has been a discernible wrist release/snap--at least I don't think so. The elbow and hitting shoulder have also pushed forward. The angle of the racqueet face in the previous frame was perpendicular to the court. In this frame it's slightly closed (less than 90 degrees to the court). Though Nadal has an extreme grip, he's not hitting with an extremely closed racquet face, or a racquet face that is closed at all--it may very well have been perpendicular at contact or a degree or two closed. Contact is made a little higher than waist high and right in front of the right foot. Interestingly, the hitting arm is not straight--it's slightly bent.

    The next 6 frames: Check out how that aforementioned angle hasn't changed. The wrist hasn't released. The point of maximum extension is the 6th frame from contact. The tip of the racquet looks to me to be about two feet past the front foot and I'm moderately estimating 6 feet off of the ground (based on Nadal's height of 6'1"--the tip is higher than his head but he's got a low foundation formed by being bent at the knees with his butt lowered). From contact, until the point of maximum extension, the racquet tip appears to have rotated 90 degrees.

    Moving to the wrap: The tip will rotate 90 degrees more into a reverse finsish.

    Ok, so let's estimate how far Rafa swung the tip of the racquet and use that to approximate his racquet speed. The tip vertically traveled from a foot off the ground at the bottom of the backswing to 6 feet off the ground at the point of maximum extension. That happened in the span of 11 frames on a 250 frame/sec video. So in about 11/250 or approximately 0.04 seconds Rafa's frame is approximated to have vertically travelled 5 feet. So in the vertical direction his racquet head speed is 5 ft/0.04 sec which equals 125 ft/s. To figure out how far the tip horizontally traveled, I looked at the frame that shows the bottom of the backswing. Then I looked at the frame that shows the point of maximum extension. Looking back at the frame that shows the bottom of the backswing, I approximated that Rafa's buttcap is diagonally located between these two points. Rafa's racquet is 27 inches long (Babolat Aero Pro Drive Standard model), so I think given these estimations, a reasonable approximation is that the racquet travelled 54 inches, 4 feet 6 inches, horizontally in 0.04 seconds which equals approximately 113 ft/s--although going by diagonals is not the best way to find horizontal displacement (like I said, these are approximations so a give here may be balanced out by a take there, and vice versa). Given the angle of this video, I was not able to determine the side-to-side movement in the racquet tip on Nadal's forehand and therefore do not have a velocity for this third dimension. But I'm going to continue with my approximations and hope you guys can correct me where I'm wrong.

    Ok, so now we have two approximated velocities--horizontal (113 ft/s) and vertical (125 ft/s). What we need now is the vector sum of these two velocities to get the true, albeit approximated, racquet velocity that as I've stated, does not factor in side-to-side movement. Our vector sum comes out to be approximately 169 ft/s.

    Translating that into miles/hour we end up discovering that Rafael Nadal may approximately have 115 miles/hour of racquet speed based on the distance that his racquet tip traveled in the vertical and horizontal directions (according to approximations based on visuals) from the point at which the racquest tip was at it's lowest point (during the bottom of the backswing/start of forward swing) to the point of maximum extension after contact, over the specified 11 frames (and given the 250 frame/second setting of the video clip), and ignoring (not being able to calculate for) side-to-side movement and velocity. Those were my methods of calculation--please correct me if I'm wrong in any way. Really, please do!

    Assuming I'm somewhat right and that Rafael Nadal does generate 115 miles/hour of racquet head speed--well I don't know what to say about that, actually. His racquet head speed might actually be faster considering what I actually determined was the average velocity over the 11 frames and not the instantaneous velocity at contact. I'm simply amazed! Reportedly, Tiger Woods generates 120 miles/hour of club head speed (which is measured, I think, as instantaneous velocity at contact). But he's standing still. Rafael Nadal may be generating 115 miles/hour (or more) of racquet head speed on the dead run! Maybe that's an unfair comparison given that Tiger's driver weighs more than Rafa's Babolat? Whatever--they are two phenoms! Nike's pretty lucky, ey?

    Looking at this clip and writing this forced me to re-evaluate the role of the wrist, the look of the bottom of the backswing/contact/point of maximum extension, and of course to brush up (after all, this is Nadal's topspin forehand) on some physics. I am taking the MCAT (Medical College Admissions Test) this August and will be done going over my physics after two more weeks! Hopefully my calculations, methods, and observations weren't that far off--otherwise I have a lot to review if I want to do well on the Physical Sciences portion of the exam and if I want to understand what's really going on in the world of professional tennis.

    Let me know guys. Hope you found this interesting and enjoyable. I sure did.
    Last edited by lukman41985; 05-29-2006, 02:59 PM.

  • #2
    Dude! You are tennis-mad. I like that about you.

    You've touched upon something I've wondered about and never seen answered, and that's just what are the speeds at contact of these tennis players we watch so much. Anybody know where some stats are?

    Ever read those tennis-physics books: The Physics and Technology of Tennis, Biomechanical Principles of Tennis Technique, and Technical Tennis? I've flipped through them in some books stores and them seem like just your sort of thing.

    Comment


    • #3
      Jim,

      I doubt that the methods I used to arrive at the racquet speed are actually/completely correct. First of all, I'm using visual approximations.

      Secondly, I'm neglecting side-to-side movement and the contribution that has to overall racquet speed.

      Thirdly, my calculation of racquet head speed supposes that racquet head speed is equal to average velocity over a perhaps arbitrary interval--I don't think it's arbitrary though because I remember John writing that the racquet has maximum acceleration in the stroke from the bottom of the backswing/start of the foreward swing to maximum extension after contact. Maybe he didn't really write that and I just imagined it?. Also, racquet head speed is probably more accurately reflected by instantaneous velocity at contact and not average velocity (over the aforementioned interval).

      What'd you think about what I said about Nadal's wrist. Do you see what I'm seeing?

      Let me know.
      Last edited by lukman41985; 05-29-2006, 09:03 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        I just saw this thread.

        This speed analysis hinges on the assumption of a frame rate of 250 per second. This particular video is about half that. I say this because we never see contact on this video. The ball-racket contact time should be close to 1/250th to 1/200th of second regardless of racket speed or ball speed(This number of 4 to 5 ms of contact time is fairly well documented). In 250 fps video, there should be one frame where the ball is touching the strings. But here we don't see the ball within 5 inches of the racket.

        The other thing is 115 mph of racket speed just doesn't make sense for a running FH. Nadal can barely generate that racket speed on his serve. (According to Brody's "Physics and Technology of Tennis", racket speed and ball speed are very close to each other on the serve.)

        Divide that by two; 57.5 mph of racket speed is worthy of Nadal. It is very impressive for a forehand, never mind a reverse/buggy-whip forehand.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jhm36
          Ever read those tennis-physics books: The Physics and Technology of Tennis,
          I have a copy of this one and have read the interesting(quantitative) parts in this book. In general, anytime I encounter any numbers associated with Tennis, I read with great interest.
          I mentioned a couple of numbers already.

          I believe 65 mph is a good speed for a ground stroke. Very few players can hit a ground stroke at 100 mph. I remember reading that 110 mph is about the record (or at least a huge number) for an overhead. Other than serves(where the pre-hit ball speed is zero), the post-hit ball speed is significan't higher than the racket speed, so you can rule out 115 mph swings on ground strokes.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi Maverik,

            yeah, I wish we could get more stats on just how fast the pros are hitting groundstrokes. Every now and then you see the speed on some incredible 95 mile per hour forehand winner, but I'd like to see more average speed numbers.


            On the second page of the "Ball Speed in Pro Tennis" you can find some numbers on Sampras saying out of nine forehands the average speed was 76 mph while the two backhands timed were at 69.

            Maybe John's got another article in the works focusing on this part of the 'heavy ball.'

            Comment


            • #8
              Now that's funny. I was watching the clip and wondering what Federer-Haas Aussie 06 had to do with all this and then Federer whips out a 104 mph winner and I got that 'ah ha' feeling.

              The fastest 'regular' kind of 'near the baseline' forehand I've ever seen posted was Federer's 175kph (108.7mph) shot early in his match against Gonzalez at Monte Carlo 2005. Took me a while to find it on my disc but it came off of a Gonzalez backhand with a lot of topspin sent to Fed's backhand that he ran around and drilled down the line.

              I've heard of a few faster forehands, but I wonder if there were hit from near the baseline or maybe they werer on service returns where the server's pace could help you out or hitting down on high sitters near the net where the angle comes to your aid and you can drill the ball downwards without having to worry about it going long.

              Hey, here's a good topic for a new essay in the Advanced Tennis section: How to hit the 100mph forehand. I could use that kind of weapon in my bag of tricks.

              Comment

              Who's Online

              Collapse

              There are currently 14409 users online. 6 members and 14403 guests.

              Most users ever online was 139,261 at 09:55 PM on 08-18-2024.

              Working...
              X