Great article John! It, and the rest of the issue, was definitely worth the wait. Glad to hear Vegas went well. I would love to take you up on next year's offer to go to Indian Wells. Let's do it!
But back to this article. So Federer's forehand averages 2700 rpm and Nadal's forehand averages 3200 rpm--20% more spin on Rafa's forehand. Which had me thinking, well what kind of spin.
If I had to guess, Rafa's forehand, on average probably has more of a topspin component to it than Roger's. I'm saying this because Rafa uses, as you said, the reverse finish so often whereas Roger tends to windshield across the ball. I think the reverse motion increases the topspin component on the forehand because it is a more vertical motion.
So Rafa's ball bounds forward much more than Roger's, in my mind, not only because of the 500 rpm's of extra spin, but also because of the higher topspin component.
The article didn't mention that, so maybe I'm wrong.
But back to this article. So Federer's forehand averages 2700 rpm and Nadal's forehand averages 3200 rpm--20% more spin on Rafa's forehand. Which had me thinking, well what kind of spin.
If I had to guess, Rafa's forehand, on average probably has more of a topspin component to it than Roger's. I'm saying this because Rafa uses, as you said, the reverse finish so often whereas Roger tends to windshield across the ball. I think the reverse motion increases the topspin component on the forehand because it is a more vertical motion.
So Rafa's ball bounds forward much more than Roger's, in my mind, not only because of the 500 rpm's of extra spin, but also because of the higher topspin component.
The article didn't mention that, so maybe I'm wrong.
Comment