Let's look into this a bit...lobndropshot if you would be so kind. In separate posts starting with the smallest height list in chronological order the player, the year and the championship. Then we will have a clearer picture perhaps how size, racquet size, court engineering are related to each other.
It is not enough to say tennis players are getting taller. We must take into consideration all of the factors that we can in order to understand the ramifications. The list of heights is around 200, so maybe fifty years of Slams. This will include 20 years of classic tennis and 30 years of post 1984 tennis...the culmination point of classic to "modern" tennis.
klacr has made some rather interesting statements that demand clarification.
It is not enough to say tennis players are getting taller. We must take into consideration all of the factors that we can in order to understand the ramifications. The list of heights is around 200, so maybe fifty years of Slams. This will include 20 years of classic tennis and 30 years of post 1984 tennis...the culmination point of classic to "modern" tennis.
klacr has made some rather interesting statements that demand clarification.
Comment