The issue is complex. With the more extreme grips in general the wrist is less laid back around contact. That's natural given the way the hand position aligns the racket handle...
But on the majority of all balls, particularly with grips in the Fed to Agassi range, the wrist is laid back at contact, and also laid back to the same degree or sometimes even more after contact. There also seems to be a relationship between court position, shot direction, and the degree or angle of the lay back.
If wrist flexion means the attempt to snap the wrist forward that is not happening at the level of conscious muslce contraction.
Nonetheless the obsession with the use of the wrist in the forehand continues and now based on 20 years of discussion I suspect will for the future. It's like debates over diet, cholesteral and statins.
But on the majority of all balls, particularly with grips in the Fed to Agassi range, the wrist is laid back at contact, and also laid back to the same degree or sometimes even more after contact. There also seems to be a relationship between court position, shot direction, and the degree or angle of the lay back.
If wrist flexion means the attempt to snap the wrist forward that is not happening at the level of conscious muslce contraction.
Nonetheless the obsession with the use of the wrist in the forehand continues and now based on 20 years of discussion I suspect will for the future. It's like debates over diet, cholesteral and statins.
Comment