Proof that Nadal is lying about which frame he is using.

[GeoffWilliams]

nadals frame

This frame was sold at auction, sanctioned by Australian open, that shows his cortex is painted on, and that he is using the apd original frame, not the cortex frame showed side by side. Master psych artist, ped cheater (according to some), cheats with coaching, and lies about which frame he uses. Some great role model, eh guys? He is getting an expemption due to his knee injury to use steroids. So even when he tests positive, for them, it won't count at all. The atp is rubber stamping the ped cheating, and not just with this rat boy. The butt pick kid, is what I call him. Antelope psych, vampire psych, etc. psych. Anything to win, eh Nadal? Only a matter of time before you pay the ultimate price for ped cheating. It's called death by cancer.

The atp will continue to ignore the ped cheating at the cost of the players health and safety, in favor of the money trail: advertising, and frame makers. Most players don't use the frames they lie about using, esp. Murray, who uses the same frame he did when he was 14yr. old: pt57A 16 x 19 pattern. Paint jobs are all too common, even with strings. So who cares that the public is being lied to and defrauded with false ads? No one but the people buying frames that have nothing to do with the truth.

This is the real frame he has used since 14yrs. old: apd original with lead tape (not his, which is at 12 oclock under the grommet strip)

[nikae]

Yup, most ATP players use only paint jobs. Right now there's only one guy in top 100 using the retail version of the racket (blx blade), without any lead on it. David Goffin.

[lobndropshot]

nadals frame

This frame was sold at auction, sanctioned by Australian open, that shows his cortex is painted on, and that he is using the apd original frame, not the cortex frame showed side by side. Master psych artist, ped cheater (according to some), cheats with coaching, and lies about which frame he uses. Some great role model, eh guys? He is getting an expemption due to his knee injury to use steroids. So even when he tests positive, for them, it won't count at all. The atp is rubber stamping the ped cheating, and not just with this rat boy. The butt pick kid, is what I call him. Antelope psych, vampire psych, etc. psych. Anything to win, eh Nadal? Only a matter of time before you pay the ultimate price for ped cheating. It's called death by cancer.

The atp will continue to ignore the ped cheating at the cost of the players health and safety, in favor of the money trail: advertising, and frame makers. Most players don't use the frames they lie about using, esp. Murray, who uses the same frame he did when he was 14yr. old: pt57A 16 x 19 pattern. Paint jobs are all too common, even with strings. So who cares that the public is being lied to and defrauded with false ads? No one but the people buying frames that have nothing to do with the truth.

This is the real frame he has used since 14yrs. old: apd original with lead tape (not his, which is at 12 oclock under the grommet strip)

what about Santa?

[GeoffWilliams]

The local woman who lives in Novato, sued Nike for false adverstising, re: the ball tiger woods uses. Nike was forced to admit that they were lying about it, and then they said they would make the actual ball more like the stiffer ball woods uses. She has an office in sf and a house in Novato. Going after the manufacturer like she did was in my opinion, a not so great attempt at black mailing them into a settlement so she would drop the case. Instead of giving in to her, they paid way more in bad publicity, and now have to come up with a whole new manufactured product line. All of the current pros who are lying about their frames are put up to it by the manufacturers, so that they can sell the latest newest frames while the players continue in large part to use obsolete models they got used to as younger players, ie, Nadal and Murray both use the same frames they did when they were 14 yrs. old. It's all done to fool people into thinking they have the same frame their hero does, so they can play like them or better anyway. That practice makes the frame makers vulnerable to the same tactics she used against nike. For the same reasons: lies about the frames, paint jobs, in the obvious attempt to fool the buyers of those frames. Any lawyers out there who could comment on such a suit?

[stotty]

Going on for years..

The local woman who lives in Novato, sued Nike for false adverstising, re: the ball tiger woods uses. Nike was forced to admit that they were lying about it, and then they said they would make the actual ball more like the stiffer ball woods uses. She has an office in sf and a house in Novato. Going after the manufacturer like she did was in my opinion, a not so great attempt at black mailing them into a settlement so she would drop the case. Instead of giving in to her, they paid way more in bad publicity, and now have to come up with a whole new manufactured product line. All of the current pros who are lying about their frames are put up to it by the manufacturers, so that they can sell the latest newest frames while the players continue in large part to use obsolete models they got used to as younger players, ie, Nadal and Murray both use the same frames they did when they were 14 yrs. old. It's all done to fool people into thinking they have the same frame their hero does, so they can play like them or better anyway. That practice makes the frame makers vulnerable to the same tactics she used against nike. For the same reasons: lies about the frames, paint jobs, in the obvious attempt to fool the buyers of those frames. Any lawyers out there who could comment on such a suit?

This kind of thing has been going on for years. Nastase's wooden Adidas racket was a painted Maxply. Nastase's contract with Adidas was the biggest ever in tennis at that time but the racket didn't cut it for him....so they painted a Maxply...he's previous racket.

Nadal gave his racket to a friend of mine (who was in the crowd) after a match at Queen's club. I have seen the racket. It was definitely the Babolat sold in shops. So that's odd.