I really liked John's article on Gayathri's backhand and can't disagree with anything he is saying. But there is one little thing I see in her backswing that I am finding is important for my players. I wonder if anyone else is finding the same thing. If you look carefully at the way she makes her unit turn (and this is a little more obvious on the corrected fully open sequence), you can see she makes the turn, pauses and then swings a little further inside and then loops down and into her stroke. To me that little additional swing a little further is a little like a hitch which will make it tough for her to handle really deep and heavy balls. When my players complete their unit turn and backhand grip change, I want them to have the racket shaft at least parallel to the line through their shoulders. If they leave the racket outside a line parallel to the shoulders they have to swing it inside before they can really go after the stroke. I think you can see this difference in the sequence right there of Kim Clijsters. Granted she has a much greater preparatory shoulder turn, but look at the early position of the racket shaft relative to a line parallel to her shoulders. From where Kim is, she just drops and goes. Gayathri has to swing the racket further inside before she can do this.
I am not advocating "Getting the racket back" earlier or farther like maybe Venus, but just to get the angle of the racket shaft a little more inside when she completes her grip change. Then she is ready to drop and go. I see a lot of success with my students when I focus on this positioning.
Anybody else find this to be the case?
don
I am not advocating "Getting the racket back" earlier or farther like maybe Venus, but just to get the angle of the racket shaft a little more inside when she completes her grip change. Then she is ready to drop and go. I see a lot of success with my students when I focus on this positioning.
Anybody else find this to be the case?
don
Comment