Watched the Federer Davydenko match in Oz. Stayed up late to watch it and managed to keep my eyes open until Federer was up a break in the 4th set.
I've never seen a professional tennis player go from being THAT HOT (Davydenko) to THAT COLD that quick. I may never have seen anyone ever playing as well as Davydenko did through 1 1/2 sets.
Federer definitely started poorly, but to my eye Davy's play had a lot to do with it. The change in conditions played a part as well (once the sun was off the court the surface did look to have slowed down). But those are incidentals in the story, I think.
I've watched chunks of the match again on DVD and it looks just as mysterious as it did live. I found myself laughing outloud at the severity and instantaneousness of how the match swung.
I've had experiences like that on the court, where I went from very hot to cold, or vice versa, but not any swings of that magnitude.
This would be a great subject for an article on this site by any of the experts on the mental game, I think. I would love to gain understanding of what were the changes, physically, in what Davy was doing "before" and "after" other than "hittings winners" and then "making unforced errors." Clearly the change was mental, but how those mental changes expressed themselves in the nuts and bolts of his play would make an interesting study. (I mean more specific than "moving better/worse" or "worse 1st serve %." I mean, e.g., was his first step to the ball later or less explosive? Was his racquet preparation delayed? Were his shot selection and patterns suddenly different? Was he suddenly caught playing much further behind the baseline because his shot had lost depth? etc.)
Davy's W/UE count, set by set: 7/5, 6/15, 4/14, 16/18
Federer's W/UE count, set by set: 9/17, 10/10, 2/2, 14/14
So, on its face it looks like in 1st 1 1/2 sets Federer was spraying the ball, and in 2H set 2 and set 3 Davy was spraying the ball. The in the final set, it was close again. But there's important stuff underneath and behind those stats.
Best to all,
ao
I've never seen a professional tennis player go from being THAT HOT (Davydenko) to THAT COLD that quick. I may never have seen anyone ever playing as well as Davydenko did through 1 1/2 sets.
Federer definitely started poorly, but to my eye Davy's play had a lot to do with it. The change in conditions played a part as well (once the sun was off the court the surface did look to have slowed down). But those are incidentals in the story, I think.
I've watched chunks of the match again on DVD and it looks just as mysterious as it did live. I found myself laughing outloud at the severity and instantaneousness of how the match swung.
I've had experiences like that on the court, where I went from very hot to cold, or vice versa, but not any swings of that magnitude.
This would be a great subject for an article on this site by any of the experts on the mental game, I think. I would love to gain understanding of what were the changes, physically, in what Davy was doing "before" and "after" other than "hittings winners" and then "making unforced errors." Clearly the change was mental, but how those mental changes expressed themselves in the nuts and bolts of his play would make an interesting study. (I mean more specific than "moving better/worse" or "worse 1st serve %." I mean, e.g., was his first step to the ball later or less explosive? Was his racquet preparation delayed? Were his shot selection and patterns suddenly different? Was he suddenly caught playing much further behind the baseline because his shot had lost depth? etc.)
Davy's W/UE count, set by set: 7/5, 6/15, 4/14, 16/18
Federer's W/UE count, set by set: 9/17, 10/10, 2/2, 14/14
So, on its face it looks like in 1st 1 1/2 sets Federer was spraying the ball, and in 2H set 2 and set 3 Davy was spraying the ball. The in the final set, it was close again. But there's important stuff underneath and behind those stats.
Best to all,
ao
Comment