Through before up
I have always been a huge naysayer for the wiper forehands that seem to predominate the game in recent years, especially among the young kids coming up without hitting through the ball. I have always insisted my players learn to hit through the ball. I felt they had the advantage when they played the other juniors because their shots had "pace" and penetrated through the court. I was certainly still pushing a circular motion from below the ball to above it with lots of topspin, but I wanted more of a classic follow through before I even let them follow through up over their shoulder, much less next to their ear.
But recently, after looking at Federer hitting so many balls with a followthrough almost to the elbow if not at least to the opposite tricep, after looking carefully at the opening graphic of Nalbandian on hi-techtennis.com, and yes, even after considering the idea behind the Topspin Trainer, I started having my students try the follow through to the opposite tricep, ala Nalbandian cited here. Note this is only after having them work on hitting through more classically for thousands and thousands of balls; and I insist they use no wrist in the motion (flexion/extension at least), so much so that I will have them hit it with the SquareHit device. But having established some understanding of hitting through first, I am having great success with introducing this more "modern" forehand. And it's been a great help in getting players out of hitting the ball with wrist flexion through contact; otherwise, a very difficult habit to break.
I think this is a much more important question that "bent/bent vs straight-arm".
And I agree, it is much harder to turn the kid that hits a wiper action without any weight on the shot to hit through the ball.
don brosseau
Originally posted by 10splayer
View Post
But recently, after looking at Federer hitting so many balls with a followthrough almost to the elbow if not at least to the opposite tricep, after looking carefully at the opening graphic of Nalbandian on hi-techtennis.com, and yes, even after considering the idea behind the Topspin Trainer, I started having my students try the follow through to the opposite tricep, ala Nalbandian cited here. Note this is only after having them work on hitting through more classically for thousands and thousands of balls; and I insist they use no wrist in the motion (flexion/extension at least), so much so that I will have them hit it with the SquareHit device. But having established some understanding of hitting through first, I am having great success with introducing this more "modern" forehand. And it's been a great help in getting players out of hitting the ball with wrist flexion through contact; otherwise, a very difficult habit to break.
I think this is a much more important question that "bent/bent vs straight-arm".
And I agree, it is much harder to turn the kid that hits a wiper action without any weight on the shot to hit through the ball.
don brosseau
Comment