I like this and find it useful but wanted a little more about independence of the linked hands from the body. If you simultaneously lean and pivot for the ball, crabbing your way through life with your racket closed or closing out front, you may have earned some fun for yourself (a dirty word in Puritan/Spartan America but maybe okay in Pioneer America).
Linked hands remained solid with body for the initial pivot but now get to take a little holiday as they start the loop. How does Roger Federer get away with this? Because he'll complete the body turn by pointing well across his body at the right fence with his left hand. Lesser players (or maybe just not too well-informed in this case) have to keep hands solid with body for much longer to attain a turn that is similar if never as great. Also, they don't qualify for Roger's desirable delay.
In all the instruction I've heard on this point, I've only had the sense of experts adding turn on to what people already do. But can't you strip down your forehand by one notch by not trying to turn too much in the micro-seconds when linked hands are moving free?
May seem like just words here but is a big difference out on the court.
Linked hands remained solid with body for the initial pivot but now get to take a little holiday as they start the loop. How does Roger Federer get away with this? Because he'll complete the body turn by pointing well across his body at the right fence with his left hand. Lesser players (or maybe just not too well-informed in this case) have to keep hands solid with body for much longer to attain a turn that is similar if never as great. Also, they don't qualify for Roger's desirable delay.
In all the instruction I've heard on this point, I've only had the sense of experts adding turn on to what people already do. But can't you strip down your forehand by one notch by not trying to turn too much in the micro-seconds when linked hands are moving free?
May seem like just words here but is a big difference out on the court.
Comment