Comfort, Slam and Moonball
At the DSO (Detroit Symphony Orchestra) Leonard Slatkin puts the violas here where the violins used to be and vice-versa.
"You're thinking too much, Maestro," a tennis player might say. "Soon there's going to be paralysis by analysis."
No, it's just that the different orchestration works better for this particular Brahms piece and the change even has historical precedent which Maestro Slatkin surely knows but doesn't want to tell the audience. Or maybe he did, yes I guess he did.
The word "orchestration" of course can apply to what instruments are on the stage as well as their placement.
Of the three forehands I've been working on, one is for comfort and a certain weight that causes certain players to overhit.
The Agassi-But-Me and Federfore cross is a spinnier shot with more clearance, Robert Lansdorp's "academic ball."
In the third shot, a ping-pong slam on which I'll work through self-feed today, there is keying of bent arm before a ripping hit and followthrough up over the opposite shoulder yoke.
What should the mondo for this shot be? About one third the size of that in the Agassi-Federfore, i.e., wrist will react back but the great forearm roll that takes racket tip from one side fence to the other will be gone.
The comfort shot I mentioned, my McEnrueful, employs no mondo whatsoever and is just a big body sweep in which aeronautically the hitting shoulder banks down and then up.
Can such a weird orchestration be tolerated by one's nerves, with torso turn start immediate (The Slanted McEnrueful) but fractionally delayed in the other two upright postured shots?
Only if all three shots are practiced as a unit. Then, the stark differences among them may facilitate assimilation until each individual shot emerges as a real man and marine just out of boot camp.
At the DSO (Detroit Symphony Orchestra) Leonard Slatkin puts the violas here where the violins used to be and vice-versa.
"You're thinking too much, Maestro," a tennis player might say. "Soon there's going to be paralysis by analysis."
No, it's just that the different orchestration works better for this particular Brahms piece and the change even has historical precedent which Maestro Slatkin surely knows but doesn't want to tell the audience. Or maybe he did, yes I guess he did.
The word "orchestration" of course can apply to what instruments are on the stage as well as their placement.
Of the three forehands I've been working on, one is for comfort and a certain weight that causes certain players to overhit.
The Agassi-But-Me and Federfore cross is a spinnier shot with more clearance, Robert Lansdorp's "academic ball."
In the third shot, a ping-pong slam on which I'll work through self-feed today, there is keying of bent arm before a ripping hit and followthrough up over the opposite shoulder yoke.
What should the mondo for this shot be? About one third the size of that in the Agassi-Federfore, i.e., wrist will react back but the great forearm roll that takes racket tip from one side fence to the other will be gone.
The comfort shot I mentioned, my McEnrueful, employs no mondo whatsoever and is just a big body sweep in which aeronautically the hitting shoulder banks down and then up.
Can such a weird orchestration be tolerated by one's nerves, with torso turn start immediate (The Slanted McEnrueful) but fractionally delayed in the other two upright postured shots?
Only if all three shots are practiced as a unit. Then, the stark differences among them may facilitate assimilation until each individual shot emerges as a real man and marine just out of boot camp.
Comment