Class Action Suit
I can detest the anthropomorphic in literature while thinking it just grand in tennis.
My forehands have soulful eyes and ears and a big mouth, and just put in a class action request to have sex with one another.
Thus my McEnrueful, furious at being neglected for weeks, argues that the form of its backswing-- a succinct bowling action down and up-- can be applied to strong eastern as well as composite grip shots.
Will they feel as good? I don't know. Certainly they will get hand to the same place (now, reader, stop any prurient thoughts you may have).
From there one can hit a Budge-bam-- shoulders first and finish off with hips-- or use the basic form of the McEnrueful, which is hips first to lower the racket followed by uppercutting shoulders.
Will these shots, once in flight, behave differently enough to justify such orchestration? How will they bounce?
I suspect big difference but haven't tried them yet-- we'll see.
One certainly will have fun if it's true.
The Ocelots, sadly, did not fare as well in competition as hoped. It's probably back to Federfores and Grigorfores for me.
But first this down and up experiment.
Once getting past don_budge's Orc-talk, an actual human being could see him making two or one point.
It's true that many people can not follow these technoposts of mine.
But is that because they are any more clotted, dense and obscure than technical discussion by anybody else? Or is it that tennis readers, not wanting as they have been taught to think too much, won't decipher anything?
To summarize this experiment then so that someone other than myself could try it, hit some forehands where shoulders go first and hips second.
Then hit some forehands where hips go first and shoulders second.
To get to the beginning of the option use identical form.
I can detest the anthropomorphic in literature while thinking it just grand in tennis.
My forehands have soulful eyes and ears and a big mouth, and just put in a class action request to have sex with one another.
Thus my McEnrueful, furious at being neglected for weeks, argues that the form of its backswing-- a succinct bowling action down and up-- can be applied to strong eastern as well as composite grip shots.
Will they feel as good? I don't know. Certainly they will get hand to the same place (now, reader, stop any prurient thoughts you may have).
From there one can hit a Budge-bam-- shoulders first and finish off with hips-- or use the basic form of the McEnrueful, which is hips first to lower the racket followed by uppercutting shoulders.
Will these shots, once in flight, behave differently enough to justify such orchestration? How will they bounce?
I suspect big difference but haven't tried them yet-- we'll see.
One certainly will have fun if it's true.
The Ocelots, sadly, did not fare as well in competition as hoped. It's probably back to Federfores and Grigorfores for me.
But first this down and up experiment.
Once getting past don_budge's Orc-talk, an actual human being could see him making two or one point.
It's true that many people can not follow these technoposts of mine.
But is that because they are any more clotted, dense and obscure than technical discussion by anybody else? Or is it that tennis readers, not wanting as they have been taught to think too much, won't decipher anything?
To summarize this experiment then so that someone other than myself could try it, hit some forehands where shoulders go first and hips second.
Then hit some forehands where hips go first and shoulders second.
To get to the beginning of the option use identical form.
Comment