Report
Very promising in self-feed. Found that I preferred wishbone (actively leading with elbow on backswing) for heaviest topspin and Gordon-Yandell-Macci ATP3 for the flat version.
This could create a flawed program in that either of these choices would be telegraphed by the wind-up.
On the other hand I have another version of flat domain (my McEnrueful) which is bizarre enough to confuse most opponents when alternated with ATP3 flat or anything else.
The reason for wishbone preference when one goes about producing heavy topspin is, that, although one can learn to do the same thing from ATP3 dogpat, the racket is earlier in getting closed with tip lagged toward net, which in my view makes the shot easier to produce.
If one will permit oneself to contemplate a bit, this forehand-- the one producing heaviest topspin-- is a triple roll.
If that contention is true, I can't see why to put the first two of the three rolls too close together.
Very promising in self-feed. Found that I preferred wishbone (actively leading with elbow on backswing) for heaviest topspin and Gordon-Yandell-Macci ATP3 for the flat version.
This could create a flawed program in that either of these choices would be telegraphed by the wind-up.
On the other hand I have another version of flat domain (my McEnrueful) which is bizarre enough to confuse most opponents when alternated with ATP3 flat or anything else.
The reason for wishbone preference when one goes about producing heavy topspin is, that, although one can learn to do the same thing from ATP3 dogpat, the racket is earlier in getting closed with tip lagged toward net, which in my view makes the shot easier to produce.
If one will permit oneself to contemplate a bit, this forehand-- the one producing heaviest topspin-- is a triple roll.
If that contention is true, I can't see why to put the first two of the three rolls too close together.
Comment