I suppose this topic has been thoroughly discussed in earlier threads, but I am trying to learn a new racket sport and may take a different approach as a senior tournament player than I did for tennis as a junior. I approached tennis with a mechanistic, massed practice approach in my early years, but observed that many of my successful cohorts( at the tournament club level at least) tended to have a much higher volume of match play to volume of practice, even as juniors. Many of the better players also seemed to be much more instinctual and could not verbalize much about their skill performance journey, but plenty about finding ways to win. Finding ways to win is obviously developed by high volume match play. The tennis coaching and teaching professions are faced with blending these two approaches. This article touches on the contextual inference issue and I would appreciate any thoughts . I figured advice on learning a new racket sport for a senior might generate some discussion about the performance versus learning issue in tennis.
https://hughclarke.substack.com?utm_...utm_medium=web
https://hughclarke.substack.com?utm_...utm_medium=web
Comment